UEFA responded to Thursday’s ruling by Europe’s top court, stating that the decision, which found UEFA and FIFA in violation of EU law in hindering the creation of a rival Super League, “does not signify an endorsement or validation of” the breakaway competition.
UEFA clarified that the ruling pointed to a pre-existing shortfall in its pre-authorization framework, a technical aspect that had been acknowledged and addressed in June 2022.
The European Court of Justice based its decision on UEFA rules predating the changes made in 2022. It ruled that FIFA and UEFA’s regulations, requiring prior approval for new interclub football projects like the Super League and prohibiting clubs and players from participating, were unlawful.
However, the court emphasized that this doesn’t automatically authorize the Super League project but rather indicates FIFA and UEFA’s “abusing a dominant position” in the football market.
UEFA expressed confidence in the robustness of its new rules, asserting compliance with relevant European laws and regulations.
Despite the legal victory, UEFA, in collaboration with fans and stakeholders, emphasized their commitment to the future of European football club competition and upholding the European football pyramid.
The case dates back to April 2021 when 12 major European clubs announced plans for the Super League, seen as a direct competitor to UEFA’s Champions League reforms.
Faced with strong backlash and threats of disciplinary action from UEFA and FIFA, nine of the 12 clubs withdrew almost immediately, leading to the Super League’s collapse within 48 hours. Currently, only Real Madrid and Barcelona have not abandoned the project, with Juventus withdrawing in July.
Source: AFP
